Sunday, 5 May 2019

Maths in the outdoors



Bringing maths to the outdoors provides the children with a new scene and the concept of teaching maths outdoors isn’t thought of. Although it can be quite beneficial for students learning, and brining maths to the outdoors doesn’t only give children a change of scenery, but it also motivates them and engages them in their learning, which is agreed upon by a teacher from Plymouth University as they have stated that “Most schools taught maths outside, there was an understanding that outdoor learning was useful for ‘making abstract concepts real’. ‘I see pupils learning things sometimes that they don’t perhaps make sense of quite so quickly indoors ... This morning with the numeracy, I know a lot of children would have really struggled with grasping the concept of perimeters, but being able to walk it out ... made a lot more sense to them’ (Teacher).”(Plymouth University, 2016). With this, Pratt (2017) mentions that the outdoors can be stimulating for children, helping them to “develop mathematical disposition towards the world” and bringing maths into real life situations.  Many children find it difficult to understand mathematical concepts like this until they are given an application in real life. Sargent (2015) states that children can develop a sense of mathematics, simply by trying to play with ideas and “The outdoor environment is the ideal arena for planning maths activities that would otherwise be impractical, unattractive or impossible indoors” (p 5).  


















This image shows us the types of play that can improve mathematical development for children.

Early years pioneers, Burner (1966) and Piaget (1952) both believe that children internalise the knowledge that they gain through their hands-on experiences, which can then later lead to developing their cognitive skills (Sargent, M., 2015, p5). It is said by Sragent (2015) that Lev Vygotsky highlights the importance of social interactions and the affect it can have on their learning, which is that it can “extend each other’s learning by challenging one another’s ideas.” Supporting this, all four of the British Early Years curricula emphasise the importance of mathematical conversations between people as they can encourage and challenge each other, enabling to better themselves and enhance their holistic skills.

This video discusses mathematics in the outdoors with children and shows us what it is like for children and what they could learn from these opportunities and experiences. It shows us that whenever children are outside, they have that opportunity to develop their maths skills and knowledge.


The Welsh Assembly Government (2002) have created a play policy, which states that Play is a vital part of a child’s upbringing and development which benefits their health, happiness and wellbeing.” (p2). This supports all four of the British Early Years curricula emphasis on the importance of mathematical conversation as it requires social interaction with others which is what the outdoors can provide.  Being in the outdoors when teaching maths can help children obtain the information being provided and supporting this, Lev Vygotsky was a psychologist who believed children learn about the world around them, through physical interaction (Williams, 2008).

References

Taylor, H., & Harris, A. J. (Eds.). (2013). Learning and Teaching Mathematics 0-8. SAGE.

Pratt, N. (2017) Understanding Mathematics outside the classroom cited in Waite, S. (2017). Children learning outside the classroom : From birth to eleven. Second Edition. London: SAGE.

Plymouth University (2016) TRANSFORMING OUTDOOR LEARNING IN SCHOOLS LESSONS FROM THE NATURAL CONNECTIONS PROJECT. Available at: https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/7/7634/Transforming_Outdoor_Learning_in_Schools_SCN.pdf, [Accessed on Monday 25th of March, 2019].

Sargent, M. (2015). Developing Early Maths Skills Outdoors. Salisbury: Practical Pre-school Books.

Welsh Assembly Governemt Play Wales (2002). Welsh Assembly Government Play Policy. Wales: Welsh Assembly Government, p.2.

Williams, D. (2018). Child Development Theories: Lev Vygotsky. [online] First Discoverers. Available at: https://www.firstdiscoverers.co.uk/lev-vygotsky-child-development-theories/ [Accessed 6 May 2019].

YouTube (2012). Margaret Travers - Outdoor Maths. [video] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eZWHT3_xJc [Accessed 6 May 2019].

Will teachers be replaced by technology?




Teachers play an important role in education, it is a performance, and this is something that technology cannot accomplish. This is recognized by Purewal (2016) as he states that “teaching is a performance, its reading the room and working it” which is something technology is unable to do, as he also says, “empathy is a key area of difficulty for technology and automation”. Technology is a good resource to find information and to use as a learning tool, although, they cannot form emotions. Emotions is what helps us to properly education and help children. Purewal (2016) also supports this by saying “Technology can’t detect emotional states, let alone adapt its behaviour to cater accordingly” and this ability to detect others’ emotions enables practitioners to relate to and understand the children, meaning that they’re more capable of meeting the needs of and educating the students. They’re also able to create a bond with them, forming a relationship means it is more likely students will tur to their practitioner and disclose to them.

In the life as a practitioner, things don’t always plan out as they’re meant to; meaning that a member off staff may not be in, or activities can’t go ahead and practitioners are required to think ahead and have a ‘plan B’ or sometimes thinking on their feet, which is something technology is unable to do. In agreement with this, Purewal (2016) states that it is one of the key skills a practitioner has. Opposing to this idea that teachers cannot be replaced is Kalia (2018) who believes that there is a high chance that teachers will be replaced as she states that “the 2017 Oxford University's study estimated that 47% of all U.S. jobs could be replaced by AI-Bots within 20 years”. Although this may be the situation, technology at the moment is used more as a tool in education, to help aid practitioners.  The reason for this may be because technology provides wide range of information and introducing new technologies will, in some ways replace what practitioner do,  as It can aid data-gathering significantly, freeing up teachers’ time and allowing them to focus on more important aspects of their work” (Purewal, H., 2016).

Technology has advanced greatly over the years and we are able to connect with the world. In agreement to this, Purewal (2016) states that “technology has the potential to reach those who don’t have access to a classroom”, for example, some practitioners contact external agencies, celebrities or other schools around the world as part of their approach to learning and engaging students. The effectiveness of technology in education is dependent on the practitioners’ ability to integrate it into their teaching (Kent, T. W., & McNergney, R. F., 1999). As technology is advancing and integrating in businesses, teachers’ jobs could be a risk as Michael Trucano (2015) states that “Teachers who don't use technology will be replaced by teachers who do.

As mentioned by Hooper and Rieber (1995), schoolwork focusses more on remembering, organisation of lessons and ensuring that curriculum is followed, rather than making the information they are providing meaningful. This is a video showing us the future of education and what happens with the help of practitioners educating students to be life long learners rather than teaching them to be good test takers.


References

Hooper, S., & Rieber, L. P. (1995). Teaching with technology. Teaching: Theory into practice, 2013, 154-170.

Kalia, T. (2018), Cost-Benefit Analysis of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Fired Robots (AI-Bots) Replacing Educators, St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis.

Kent, T. W., & McNergney, R. F. (1999). Will Technology Really Change Education? From Blackboard to Web. Corwin Press, Inc., A Sage Publications Company, 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320.

Purewal, H. (2016). Can technology replace teachers? You asked Google – here’s the answer | Harpreet Purewal. [online] the Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/dec/07/can-technology-replace-teachers-google [Accessed 5 May 2019].

YouTube (2016). This Is the Future of Education. [video] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQ-tjdMnHlA [Accessed 6 May 2019].

Technology within education


Technological advancements are always being made and it is used in everyday life; work life, social life and personal life. Technology in education today plays an important role in improving children’s learning, enabling them to enhance their skills holistically and knowledge. Technology is manifested through the use of computers and iPad or Macs or Tablets etc and it can be of great use for practitioners when planning lessons.

As well as having many benefits to using technology within education, there are also some negatives. One of the positives of technology within education is that it promotes independent learning and students can use the resource as a source of information as they have access to the world. Although, with such freedom, there are also some challenges to this. Some content online may be explicit and inappropriate for students. To overcome this challenge, it is important that there are precautions made when allowing students to use technology. This can be done by blocking certain websites and talking to the children and parents about internet safety. It can also be beneficial to get external agencies in the school to talk to the students, making them aware of the dangers and how to stay safe online. As mentioned by Chang & Wang (2009); Kessler & Plakans (2008); Sacristán, Sandoval & Gil (2007) technology has obtained increasing amount of attention in education. It has become a big part of education and is used as a earning tool. Graham (2008) agrees that in order to teach children effectively using technology, both students and teachers need to be in a technology- rich environment. It is also important to make students, teachers and parents aware of the possible dangers and challenges that come when using technology. Technology can be costly for schools, which may prevent them from providing modern technological tools.  

This is a short video which shows us some of the positives and negatives of technology within education.


Technology changes the way in which students are taught and as Tapscott (2009) says, “DT has enabled education processes to depart from ‘old- fashioned’ teacher delivery of content and instead to ‘focus on lifelong learning, not teaching to the test’”(p 148). In order to use technology as a tool to educate children, teachers need to be properly trained as teachers need to feel confident when using technology because it will enable them to gain full use of it. Nagel (2013) mentions that the lack of adequate, ongoing professional development for teachers who are required to integrate new technologies into their classrooms yet who are unprepared or unable to understand new technologies.” Supporting this, Yeung, A.S. et al (2012) says that “education should reconsider training contents and approaches.”  Agreeing with Yeung, et al., Mcwilliam (2008), has said that in order to teach students about and with technology, they need to develop their skills, knowledge and confidence. Although, as technology is always up dating, as it is becoming more and more costly, meaning that some schools may not be able to afford it. This is mentioned by the British Council as they also thatSchools undoubtedly avoid using technology because they lack the sufficient budget spending it entails (Teaching English | British Council | BBC, 2019). This would mean that children are prevented from further enhancing their skills and knowledge because schools do not have sufficient funding. Donaldson believes that we need to be more than consumers of technology and to develop the knowledge and skills required to use technology creatively.

Teachers play an important role in education, it is a performance, and this is something that technology cannot accomplish. This is recognized by Purewal (2016) as he states that “teaching is a performance, its reading the room and working it” which is something technology is unable to do, as he also says, “empathy is a key area of difficulty for technology and automation”. Technology is a good resource to find information and to use as a learning tool, although, they cannot form emotions. Emotions is what helps us to properly education and help children. Purewal (2016) also supports this by saying “Technology can’t detect emotional states, let alone adapt its behaviour to cater accordingly” and this ability to detect others’ emotions enables practitioners to relate to and understand the children, meaning that they’re more capable of meeting the needs of and educating the students. They’re also able to create a bond with them, forming a relationship means it is more likely students will tur to their practitioner and disclose to them.


In the life as a practitioner, things don’t always plan out as they’re meant to; meaning that a member off staff may not be in, or activities can’t go ahead and practitioners are required to think ahead and have a ‘plan B’ or sometimes thinking on their feet, which is something technology is unable to do. In agreement with this, Purewal (2016) states that it is one of the key skills a practitioner has. Opposing to this idea that teachers cannot be replaced is Kalia (2018) who believes that there is a high chance that teachers will be replaced as she states that “the 2017 Oxford University's study estimated that 47% of all U.S. jobs could be replaced by AI-Bots within 20 years”. Although this may be the situation, technology at the moment is used more as a tool in education, to help aid practitioners.  The reason for this may be because technology provides wide range of information and introducing new technologies will, in some ways replace what practitioner do,  as It can aid data-gathering significantly, freeing up teachers’ time and allowing them to focus on more important aspects of their work” (Purewal, H., 2016).

Technology has advanced greatly over the years and we are able to connect with the world. In agreement to this, Purewal (2016) states that “technology has the potential to reach those who don’t have access to a classroom”, for example, some practitioners contact external agencies, celebrities or other schools around the world as part of their approach to learning and engaging students. The effectiveness of technology in education is dependent on the practitioners’ ability to integrate it into their teaching (Kent, T. W., & McNergney, R. F., 1999). As technology is advancing and integrating in businesses, teachers’ jobs could be a risk as Michael Trucano (2015) states that “Teachers who don't use technology will be replaced by teachers who do.

As mentioned by Hooper and Rieber (1995), schoolwork focusses more on remembering, organisation of lessons and ensuring that curriculum is followed, rather than making the information they are providing meaningful. This is a video showing us the future of education and what happens with the help of practitioners educating students to be life long learners rather than teaching them to be good test takers.


As these technological advancements are being made, it is also said that they are also affecting the curriculum by Watanabe-Crockett (2013) who says thatEducators are taking advantage of open resources to expand their curricula with media-rich tools and texts that can be used and adapted to specific lessons," according to the report. "Formerly bound by the framework of standardized course materials, teachers now have access to a wealth of digital information that they can use to meet district expectations." The LNF is available for practitioners to use to develop curriculum content, which ensures that learners have the opportunities to develop and refine their skills set.

As we are in the 21st century, technology is incorporated in everyday life, including education. There are many benefits and negatives to incorporating modern technology in lessons. When using technology in lessons, it can be distracting for the students and the people around them, which is supported by Himmelsbach (2019) as he states thatLaptops distract from learning, both for users and for those around them
and this could lead to bad performances in class. Although, technology within lessons can provide different opportunities for children as it can become more fun and enjoyable, meaning that children are more likely to be engaged in the lesson. This is believed to have a positive outcome for the students by Savvidis (2016) as he states that Students who are engaged and interested in things they are studying, are expected to have a better knowledge retention”. This outcome could possibly lead to the children having a successful future with technology as Students can gain the skills they will need to be successful in the future” (Savvidis, P., 2016) as most organisations use modern technology as it has now become a necessity.



References

Chang, C. &Wang, H. (2009). Issues of inquiry learning in digital learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 1, 169-173.

Graham, L. (2008). Teachers are digikids too: the digital histories and digital lives of young teachers in English primary schools. Literacy, 42, 1, 10-18.

Himmelsbach, V. (2019). Six Major Pros & Cons of Technology in the Classroom. [online] Top Hat. Available at: https://tophat.com/blog/6-pros-cons-technology-classroom/ [Accessed 6 May 2019].

Kessler, G. & Plakans, L. (2008). Does teachers' confidence with CALL equal innovative and integrated use? Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21, 3, 269-282.

McWilliam, E. (2008). Unlearning how to teach. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 45, 3, 263-269.

Nagel, D. (2013). 6 Technology Challenges Facing Education -- THE Journal. [online] THE Journal. Available at: https://thejournal.com/articles/2013/06/04/6-technology-challenges-facing-education.aspx [Accessed 5 May 2019].

Sacristán, A., Sandoval, I. & Gil, N. (2007). Incorporating digital technologies to the mathematics classroom: in-service teachers reflect on the changes in their practice. Conference Proceedings of the Psychology of Mathematics & Education of North America Annual Meeting, 1-144.

Savvidis, P. (2016). Top 6 benefits of using technology in the classroom. [online] Webanywhere.co.uk. Available at: https://www.webanywhere.co.uk/blog/2016/02/top-6-benefits-technology-classroom/ [Accessed 6 May 2019].

Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital. New York: McGraw-Hill.

TeachingEnglish | British Council | BBC. (2019). Using technology in lessons. [online] Available at: https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/blogs/nanashengelaia/using-technology-lessons-1 [Accessed 6 May 2019].

Watanabe-Crockett, L. (2013). 6 Technology Challenges Facing Education. [online] Wabisabilearning.com. Available at: https://www.wabisabilearning.com/blog/6-technology-challenges-facing-education [Accessed 5 May 2019].

Yeung, A.S. et al., 2012. Mandatory use of technology in teaching: Who cares and so what? British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), pp.859–870.

YouTube (2014). Media and Technology in Education: Pros and Cons. [video] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=108&v=MpGHLwVuxt0 [Accessed 5 May 2019].





Saturday, 4 May 2019

Problem solving


Problem solving is one of the key skills to have in life and supporting this, Noyes, A (2007) states that Maths is a requirement for pupils to contribute and participate within society. Children are taught maths and problem solving to enhance their skills, preparing them for their future in our society. Although, the way maths is presented in the classroom can be off putting for children as some practitioners use the traditional method of teaching, which is standing in front of the classroom and sharing information rather than involving students and allowing discussion. Using Problem solving in maths can arguably address the purposes of the curriculum;

1.      ambitious, capable learners, ready to learn throughout their lives

2.      enterprising, creative contributors, ready to play a full part in life and work

3.      ethical, informed citizens of Wales and the world

4.      healthy, confident individuals, ready to lead fulfilling lives as valued members of society.”

(Donaldson, 2015, p.29)

The reason for this belief is because if children are able to problem solve, they may possibly become more “ambitious, capable learners, ready to learn throughout their lives”, and this relates to the term ‘life long learners’. (Donaldson, 2015, p 29). Problem solving could also help pupils to develop a better understanding of mathematical concepts and build confidence when using maths in everyday situations. Supporting this, Donaldson (2015) mentions that “it includes experiences that enable children and young people to develop their broader numeracy skills by exploring relationships in quantities, space and data, and to apply them to real-life situations” (2015, p 49), helping children to gain a better understanding of the world around them and manage their lives, giving them skills to make informed decisions. Agreeing with this, Mooney, et al. (2014) states that “children need to develop a good mathematical understanding in order to function effectively as members a society” (2014. P 11). 

Donaldson also believes that problem solving in maths can also support children in further developing their holistic skills, “particularly, critical thinking, problem solving, planning, organization, creativity and innovation” (Donaldson 2015, p 49). Pratt (2016) supports Donaldson simply by mentioning that problem solving alters the kind of knowledge they develop, as “Children taught through problem solving and mathematical thinking simply develop a different kind of mathematical knowledge than those taught through explanation and routine practice.” (2006, p.62).  

This video tells us three reasons why we need problem solving skills in life; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6IMRBDvOwo 

Problem solving comes naturally to children as they are new to the world and have many curiosities. Due to this, “they exhibit curiosity, intelligence, and flexibility as they face new situations…they are able to shape and to solve mathematical problems is the essence of con-structing mathematical meaning”, allowing them to critically think (Pound and Lee, 2011, p 25).  Teachers can be restricting when it comes to maths. Relating to this, Resnick (1988) has mentioned that some practitioners tend to use stereotypical problems and provide certain rules in order for children to respond with a simple- minded answer (1988, p 4). This can hold students back from ‘thinking outside the box’ or questioning things.

References

Donaldson, G. (2015). Successful futures: Independent review of curriculum and assessment arrangements in Wales. Welsh Government.

Mooney, C., Hansen, A., Ferrie, L., & Wrathmell, R. (2014). Primary mathematics : Knowledge and understanding (Seventh ed., Achieving QTS).

Noyes, A. (2007). Rethinking school mathematics. London: Paul Chapman Publishing

Pratt, N. (2006) Interactive Maths Teaching in the Primary School. London: Sage.

Resnick, L. B. (1988) ‘Treating mathematics as an ill-structured discipline’, in R. I. Charles and E. A. Silver (eds) The Teaching and Assessing of Mathematical Problem Solving. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

YouTube (2018). 3 Reasons Why It's Important To Solve Problems. [image] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6IMRBDvOwo [Accessed 4 May 2019].

Maths in a classroom











See the source image
The concept of maths can arguably intimidate many students in todays’ education due to a variety of things. I’ll be discussing the stigma around mathematics and how we can improve the student's attitudes towards maths in the classroom.  To enable children to enhance their mathematic skills and knowledge, it’s important to use maths in real life situations for children to gain a better understanding, as Boaler says, “There would be no great musicians if in music sessions students could only move notes around on a page. Great musicians develop by applying the theory to practice in hands on experiences. This isn’t happening enough in classrooms across the globe when it comes to maths.” (Boaler, 2014, p 130). Coles and Copland support this statement as they believe that “working with 'realistic' problems - problems that are 'sensible' in that they could have meaning outside the mathematics classroom - appears to provide sound learning experiences for pupils”. (Coles and Copland, 2002, page 2) which suggests that putting maths into real life situations proves to be beneficial for children, enabling them to “apply maths to real life problems or situations. It is suggested by Welchman- Tischler (1992) that linking literature with maths promotes children’s interest and helps them to make connections of mathematical ideas to their personal experiences, and Briggs and Davis support this by mentioning  that “literature offers an opportunity to link abstract mathematical ideas with other events in children’s everyday lives.” (Briggs, M. and Davis, S. 2012, p 68) meaning that they will have a better understanding of maths and how it may be used in the real world. 


It is the Welsh Government’s priority to raise the standards in numeracy across wales and according to Learning Wales (2016) the National Numeracy Programme is in place to set out actions which will improve numeracy standards across the curriculum. There are many ways in which a practitioner can make maths fun, such as, changing the scenery or creating games or new activities etc. By changing the scenery this can help give a child a fresh outlook, enabling them to expand and express their thoughts and feelings. Currently, students are still being taught maths in a generic and old - fashioned way. for example, teacher at the front talking at students or handing a text books for students to complete. Although, in primary schools, practitioners are always looking for new ways to teach children and engage them, for explore, forest school- can take children up to forest school and teach maths there.  From my past experience with maths, using different ICT tools such as Kahoot, was helpful as it was competitive and fun although, there can be some downsides to this as some students may guess answers rather than thinking about it.

This video shows us an example of how we could make maths more fun, enabling children to learn more effectively and gain positive experience.







Some children have bad experiences when it comes to being taught maths, which can affect there learning. For example, some students may not understand, therefore not enjoying it, they may have a teacher they do not like or get along with, the classroom may be disruptive etc. As mentioned by Noyes (2007) “There is no doubt mathematic skill will be required for pupils to contribute and participate in society in later life however the way some maths is presented put pupils off”. To improve their experience with maths there are few things that can be done, such as presenting maths in a fun way; which goes back to what was said above, that teaching in a different space may help make maths more enjoyable and exciting. There are many ways of making maths fun and exciting for children, simply by having a positive attitude towards maths can make a difference. If children see that the practitioner is not enjoying the subject, they will sense this feeling and mirror it.  The Literacy and Numeracy Framework (LNF) set out to develop curriculum content which is to “ensure all learners have opportunities to develop and refine the skills set out in the LNF.” (Government, 2019). Maths is viewed as an important skill set to obtain along with literacy and science and supporting this, Compton et al (2007) mentions that “mathematics is the ability to use a form of abstract, logical reasoning to answer particular types of problems.” (Adams, 2019), meaning that it enhances the student’s ability to problem solve.



References

Adams, D. (2019). 'Maths is scary and boring' Unpacing primary mathematics.



Briggs, M. and Davis, S. (2012) Creative Teaching: Mathematics in the Early Years and Primary Classroom. London: Routledge

Boaler, J., Wiliam, D. et al., (2000). “Students’ experiences of ability grouping – disaffection, polarisation and the construction of failure.” British Education Research Journal 26 (5): 631- 648

Coles, D. and Copeland, T. (2014) Numeracy and mathematics across the primary curriculum: Building confidence and understanding. London: Routledge. Page 2.

Government, W. (2019). Learning Wales. [online] Learning.gov.wales. Available at: https://learning.gov.wales/resources/browse-all/nlnf/?lang=en [Accessed 4 May 2019].


Noyes, A. (2007). Rethinking school mathematics. London: Paul Chapman Publishing

Welchman- Tischler, R (1992) How to use literature to teach mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Available: watt.enc.org/org/online/ENC2285/2285.



P4C- Philosophy For Children














The Giving Tree
P4C (Philosophy for children) is an approach to teaching and learning which is pioneered by Mathew Lipman and it has constantly been developed over the years. It is an approach by which means to open up children’s learning through the exploration of ideas.  This approach emphasises the importance of three things; Questioning/ Enquiry, Imagination and Meaningful dialogue and Careful Reasoning/ Reflection. P4C develops four key types of thinking: Critical, Creative, Caring and Collaborative. Lentton and Vidion (2016) have said that with this philosophy, children are stimulated to draw from their imagination and ask questions, encouraging them to value their own ideas as well as others. This also means that they’re able to expand on their communication and teamworking skills as they’re able to communicate their ideas across to other people as well as listen to others. Philosophy for Children can have an impact on other areas of the curriculum, meaning that children are able to enhance their holistic skills. They’re also able to provide reasoning followed after what they say. These are some of the basic skills for successful learning.



Some books; such as, ‘The Giving Tree’ by Shel Silverstein, have a deeper meaning within it. This book conveys the tree as a caring adult figure for the young boy. So he keeps coming back to it, asking for more and more but eventually there was nothing left for it to give.  

Philosophy for Children introduces a range of viewpoints, leading them to critique and confront the morals behind the story. Mizell (2015) mentions that it allows children to familiarize them with the range of acceptable variations in the interpretation and contextualization of human rights” (2015, p 323). This means that they’re able to think before they speak and provide reasons for what they say about the stories. This enables them to develop their cognitive skills and become reasonable individuals, which is what P4C aim to do, amongst other things.



Many of the principles of Philosophy for children can be applied to children of any age. Discussions and questioning context should be encouraged by practitioners as an “Argument is seen not as a quarrel but as a collaborative search for the best answer to a question (p4c.com, 2019). This allows children the opportunity to use analytical thinking and enhance their communication skills. There are many ways in which a practitioner can encourage children to think of these philosophical questions, such as, putting them in pairs and giving them some time, going around in a circle asking them questions or providing them with images to help encourage questioning.



Philosophy for children is an approach that practitioners use to get children to discuss, think, express their feelings and ideas and to understand that not everyone has to agree, that it is okay to disagree and have a difference of opinion. Supporting this, Gorard, S., Siddique, N., and See, B mention that (2016) “The intervention aims to help children become more willing and able to question, reason, construct arguments and collaborate with others.” This means that it encourages children to become more open minded about life and have a better understanding of the world around them and one of the aims of philosophy for children is to help them build a sense of community.



This is a video of Stephen Gorard and Stefan Molyneux discussing Philosophy for Children:




This is another video of children in a school setting analytically discussing philosophical questions and sharing their thoughts through picture books: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5wuHRyHez0&nohtml5=False

I believe that this shows us how well children can discuss philosophical questions and there understanding of these stories.  





References 

GORRD, S., SIDDIQUI, N. and SEE, B. (2016). Can ‘Philosophy for Children’ Improve Primary School Attainment?. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 51(1), pp.5-22.

Lenton and Vidion (2016) Available at: http://www.philosophy4children.co.uk/home/p4c/ . Accessed at: 18/02/19. 

Mizell, K. (2015). Philosophy for Children, Community of Inquiry, and Human Rights Education. Childhood & Philosophy, 11(22), 319-328.

p4c.com. (2019). Teacher's Guide | p4c.com. [online] Available at: https://p4c.com/about-p4c/teachers-guide/ [Accessed 4 May 2019].

Youtube (2011). Picture Book Philosophy. [video] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5wuHRyHez0&nohtml5=False [Accessed 4 May 2019].



YouTube (2016). Philosophy for Children | Stephen Gorard and Stefan Molyneux. [image] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wY1m2MqXj0 [Accessed 4 May 2019].